OK.... so I have been reading..
I get the idea that " a simulacrum is not a copy of the real, but becomes truth in its own
right: the hyperreal".
And I understand that 'Where Plato saw two
steps of reproduction – faithful and intentionally distorted (simulacrum) —
Baudrillard sees four: (1) basic reflection of reality, (2) perversion of
reality; (3) pretence of reality (where there is no model); and (4) simulacrum,
which "bears no relation to any reality whatsoever"' (and sorry this is from Wiki)
Except... what is number (3) - p"retence of reality... where there is no model". How does this fit in? Where and when? Is anyone able to give me an answer here?
I shall read to try and get some semblance of understanding:
https://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/irvinem/theory/baudrillard-simulacra_and_simulation.pdf
cannot get that second hyperlink in the correct font.... but it is working so I shall get reading
ReplyDeleteThe Jameson article above is eminently readable. All becomes clearer. As regards my problem above i think i need only concern myself with 1,2 and 4. General consensus seems to agree.
ReplyDelete